From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Cut buffers and character encoding Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:58:23 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87y7qldq6h.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <45537D3A.5080400@swipnet.se> <87mz70730i.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <45542D63.5070402@swipnet.se> <87irhn1kvk.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <455F081B.8030009@swipnet.se> <45615CE3.1060207@swipnet.se> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1164067155 10033 80.91.229.2 (20 Nov 2006 23:59:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:59:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: yamaoka@jpl.org, romain@orebokech.com, handa@m17n.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 21 00:59:12 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GmJ2b-0000Ug-Vl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 00:59:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GmJ2b-0005NI-I8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:59:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GmJ1v-0004mU-R9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:58:27 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GmJ1v-0004lY-99 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:58:27 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GmJ1u-0004l7-RN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:58:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GmJ1u-0001W1-FI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:58:26 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1GmJ1r-000801-VC; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:58:24 -0500 Original-To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan_Dj=E4rv?= In-reply-to: <45615CE3.1060207@swipnet.se> (message from =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan_Dj=E4rv?= on Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:44:35 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:62581 Archived-At: > When killing and yanking even non-Latin text within Emacs, Emacs > seems to encode and decode the text using iso-latin-1 now. > Ah, I misunderstood the check for newness, please try again (don't forget to recompile x-win.el). Didn't someone say that X11 specifies that the cut buffer is always supposed to be in latin-1? We changed Emacs so that C-x RET c would specify another coding system in case you're using one, but aside from when C-x RET c is used, Emacs should always treat it as Latin 1. Isn't that so?