From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: CVS commits and logs
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 11:08:11 -0500
Message-ID: <E1Gh719-00021G-OU@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <uirhv4eze.fsf@gnu.org> <87r6wh1o5h.fsf@olgas.newt.com>
	<buoirhtl32o.fsf@dhapc248.dev.necel.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1162830249 10386 80.91.229.2 (6 Nov 2006 16:24:09 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 16:24:09 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: wohler@newt.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 06 17:24:07 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Gh71d-00036b-CK
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 17:08:41 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Gh71c-0001Ui-Hu
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 11:08:40 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Gh71D-0001N0-DT
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 11:08:15 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Gh71C-0001M1-Nm
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 11:08:14 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gh71C-0001Lv-F4
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 11:08:14 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Gh71C-0000Yp-1d
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 11:08:14 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Gh719-00021G-OU; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 11:08:11 -0500
Original-To: Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <buoirhtl32o.fsf@dhapc248.dev.necel.com> (message from Miles
	Bader on Mon, 06 Nov 2006 11:30:07 +0900)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:61869
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/61869>

I dislike multi-file CVS commits specifically because of the clutter
of having the entire change log entry in the log of each file.

    And what about multiple _authors_?  Most of my commits are from
    automatic merging, which more often than not involves multiple authors.

Is this all a matter of Gnus?  We could handle Gnus specially.