From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Pretest
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 13:49:43 -0500
Message-ID: <E1GeFj5-0008F0-Rp@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87lkn1tzav.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
	<E1Gdsga-0004DC-5A@fencepost.gnu.org> <u3b98tgad.fsf@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1162147849 26353 80.91.229.2 (29 Oct 2006 18:50:49 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 18:50:49 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 29 19:50:48 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GeFk1-0007Up-PZ
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 19:50:41 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GeFk1-0001FA-4N
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 13:50:41 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GeFj7-0008Jy-W1
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 13:49:46 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GeFj6-0008Gs-Uc
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 13:49:45 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GeFj6-0008Gi-Pi
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 13:49:44 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GeFj6-0002JC-WA
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 13:49:45 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1GeFj5-0008F0-Rp; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 13:49:43 -0500
Original-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <u3b98tgad.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sat, 28
	Oct 2006 21:02:34 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:61343
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/61343>

    > I have a list of pretesters that I send the announcement to.  I keep
    > it in sync with emacs-pretesters, but I don't send the announcement
    > _to_ that mailing list, because that would tend to lead everyone to
    > mail all their statements of success or failure to the list as well.

    Won't `Reply-to' solve this more conveniently?

I am not sure.  What would we put in the Reply-to field?