From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: common-lisp-indent'ation of def*
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:03:28 -0400
Message-ID: <E1Gcn68-0006eg-5k@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <f7ccd24b0610230424g6449611by9dcb16522fb025c0@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1161799543 779 80.91.229.2 (25 Oct 2006 18:05:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 18:05:43 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 25 20:05:40 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Gcn7w-0000xp-7x
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 20:05:20 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Gcn7v-000873-QR
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:05:19 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Gcn6A-0007Dz-It
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:03:30 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Gcn6A-0007DQ-3c
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:03:30 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gcn69-0007D9-IJ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:03:29 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Gcn69-00033W-1p
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:03:29 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Gcn68-0006eg-5k; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:03:28 -0400
Original-To: "Juanma Barranquero" <lekktu@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <f7ccd24b0610230424g6449611by9dcb16522fb025c0@mail.gmail.com>
	(lekktu@gmail.com)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:61166
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/61166>

    So, is this a bug in `lisp-indent-line' (and the docstring of
    `calculate-lisp-indent'), and '((8 241) 241) should be treated as
    valid? Or, OTOH, it is a bug in `common-lisp-indent-function' and
    friends?

Since the callers of `lisp-indent-line' fail when it returns such a
value, I conclude they agree with its documentation.  So I conclude
that the bug is in `common-lisp-indent-function' and its subroutines.