From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Quote file name args to start-process-shell-command? Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 06:35:37 -0400 Message-ID: References: <452D54D8.7060705@student.lu.se> <452DDBC8.2060606@student.lu.se> <85y7rmou5t.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1160649430 1761 80.91.229.2 (12 Oct 2006 10:37:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:37:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 12 12:37:07 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXxvb-0001mg-P9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 12:36:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXxva-0004ZG-Q6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 06:36:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GXxue-0003lo-KY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 06:35:40 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GXxud-0003jG-Kn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 06:35:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXxuc-0003il-NV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 06:35:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GXy2p-0000AW-E6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 06:44:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1GXxub-0000Uf-CI; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 06:35:37 -0400 Original-To: David Kastrup In-reply-to: <85y7rmou5t.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on Thu, 12 Oct 2006 09:44:14 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:60642 Archived-At: > Cc: Lennart Borgman , emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: David Kastrup > Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 09:44:14 +0200 > > > Remaining arguments are strings passed as additional arguments for COMMAND. > > > > There's no requirement here that each one of the "&rest ARGS" be a > > separate command-line argument, is there? > > Then it would be completely pointless to allow several ARGS. It's not pointless, it can be useful if the command line is generated piecewise. start-process-shell-command is not system(3).