From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: emacs.texi
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 00:15:06 -0400
Message-ID: <E1GVKdW-00006O-VR@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1GUtsT-0005qU-8I@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87r6xoyxe6.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1160021751 2066 80.91.229.2 (5 Oct 2006 04:15:51 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 04:15:51 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 05 06:15:51 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GVKeB-000624-FY
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 06:15:47 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GVKeA-0004XG-PU
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 00:15:46 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GVKdY-0004CT-Rs
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 00:15:08 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GVKdX-0004BT-Rz
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 00:15:08 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GVKdX-0004BH-LE
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 00:15:07 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GVKk7-0002N3-Fn
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 00:21:55 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1GVKdW-00006O-VR; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 00:15:07 -0400
Original-To: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
In-reply-to: <87r6xoyxe6.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (message from Chong Yidong on
	Wed, 04 Oct 2006 10:21:37 -0400)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:60417
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/60417>

    I updated it about a year ago, and I don't think much has changed
    since then.

Which month was it?  We can look at papers signed since then
and see if anyone ought to be added to the list.  Or we could
update AUTHORS for the sources as of that date, and update it 
for the current sources, and diff them, to see what facts have
changed.