From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ffap not UTF-8 ready Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 08:26:34 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87y7ryjuml.fsf@zip.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1159918111 19021 80.91.229.2 (3 Oct 2006 23:28:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 23:28:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 04 01:28:29 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GUtgU-0001ba-3C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:28:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GUtgS-0000vP-7A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2006 19:28:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GUtgC-0000vI-Un for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2006 19:28:04 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GUtg9-0000v6-M2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2006 19:28:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GUtg9-0000v3-IT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2006 19:28:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [150.29.246.133] (helo=mx1.aist.go.jp) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GUtmQ-0007x5-1v; Tue, 03 Oct 2006 19:34:30 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp3.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.12]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id k93NRtgQ028555; Wed, 4 Oct 2006 08:27:55 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp3.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id k93NRsEn014218; Wed, 4 Oct 2006 08:27:55 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1GUtek-0000tF-00; Wed, 04 Oct 2006 08:26:34 +0900 Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Tue, 03 Oct 2006 10:57:57 -0400) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:60402 Archived-At: In article , Richard Stallman writes: > Since we already have regexp constructs for multibyte > characters, I guess we should make ffap use them now. I agree. In ffap.el, similar regexps are used not only in ffap-string-at-point-mode-alist but also in the other places. So, I'd like to ask the maintainer of that file to check throughout the file. --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org