From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GNU Emacs 22.0.50 fails to find =?utf-8?b?w6Q=?= in different ISO Latin encodings Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 22:10:53 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1B8CD230-9A54-4F2A-B0FA-5CD02730F034@web.de> <4CEE7BA9-0CEF-40CD-A081-2C707A44833B@web.de> <453787ED-925B-49B5-A203-3211329FCB13@web.de> <35A5EBE2-652D-488C-9CFD-E7B56A8C2D07@web.de> <87ac4rduue.fsf@catnip.gol.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1159063955 2365 80.91.229.2 (24 Sep 2006 02:12:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 02:12:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Peter_Dyballa@web.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org Original-X-From: emacs-pretest-bug-bounces+gebp-emacs-pretest-bug=gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 24 04:12:33 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gebp-emacs-pretest-bug@gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GRJTn-0002N6-84 for gebp-emacs-pretest-bug@gmane.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 04:12:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GRJTm-0008Jc-L8 for gebp-emacs-pretest-bug@gmane.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 22:12:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GRJSL-0007Qc-9v for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 22:10:57 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GRJSK-0007Q5-Gc for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 22:10:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GRJSK-0007Pq-81; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 22:10:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GRJWP-0000jL-Bb; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 22:15:09 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1GRJSH-00075Q-JP; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 22:10:53 -0400 Original-To: Miles Bader In-reply-to: <87ac4rduue.fsf@catnip.gol.com> (message from Miles Bader on Sat, 23 Sep 2006 14:18:17 +0900) X-BeenThere: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for CVS Emacs." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-pretest-bug-bounces+gebp-emacs-pretest-bug=gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-pretest-bug-bounces+gebp-emacs-pretest-bug=gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:14163 gmane.emacs.devel:60158 Archived-At: I don't really care one way or another, but Peter (Dyballa) suggests that it would be more user-friendly if non-ASCII characters entered/searched-for via C-q used a standard like unicode to interpret , rather than Emacs internal character numbers as it does now. [In Emacs 23, of course, Emacs internal character numbers will _be_ unicode, so the distinction will go away.] Let's leave it alone for now.