From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: gnus makes emacs lose response Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 23:34:24 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87u035b5ly.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87psdtb503.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1158982576 6179 80.91.229.2 (23 Sep 2006 03:36:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 03:36:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, sdl.web@gmail.com, storm@cua.dk Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 23 05:36:14 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GQyJH-0002LJ-M7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 05:36:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GQyJH-0000E2-0t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 23:36:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GQyHp-00063d-D9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 23:34:41 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GQyHo-00062s-H0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 23:34:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GQyHo-00062i-8N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 23:34:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GQyLS-0004WX-I0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 23:38:26 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1GQyHY-0005Pv-Vr; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 23:34:25 -0400 Original-To: Stefan Monnier In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Tue, 19 Sep 2006 06:45:53 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:60125 Archived-At: Oh I see, it's because I haven't updated the code in response to the following change: 2004-08-19 Kim F. Storm * process.c (wait_reading_process_input): Clean up. Add wait_for_cell, wait_proc, and just_wait_proc args to avoid overloading `read_kbd' and `do_display' args. Change read_kbd arg to int. All callers changed. So I should probably check wait_proc instead. Would you please make whatever change is needed?