From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: rcirc bug Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:57:18 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20060904135111.7ADB544005@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE> <87mz9eknqm.fsf@cut.bc.hsia.telus.net> <20060905213720.A150744004@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE> <87r6yns1rl.fsf@cut.bc.hsia.telus.net> <87irjvxg89.fsf@furball.mit.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1158004695 9168 80.91.229.2 (11 Sep 2006 19:58:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 19:58:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ams@gnu.org, rcyeske@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 11 21:58:14 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GMruy-0006pN-GC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 21:58:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GMruy-0005Bw-4W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:58:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GMruB-0004tZ-P1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:57:19 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GMruB-0004tF-Af for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:57:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GMruB-0004t6-1h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:57:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GMrvV-0006nT-Tr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:58:41 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1GMruA-0007gD-3d; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:57:18 -0400 Original-To: Chong Yidong In-reply-to: <87irjvxg89.fsf@furball.mit.edu> (message from Chong Yidong on Sun, 10 Sep 2006 22:57:26 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:59699 Archived-At: > I think it would be better to change pushnew to expand > into code that does not call any cl functions. Then programs > that load cl at compile time could use pushnew without problems. Is there really a problem? Yes: all uses of pushnew expanded into calls to `adjoin'. I changed the simple case yesterday so that it works without calling `adjoin'.