From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: rcirc bug
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 11:11:50 -0400
Message-ID: <E1GLi1G-0008C9-1d@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <20060904135111.7ADB544005@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE>
	<87mz9eknqm.fsf@cut.bc.hsia.telus.net>
	<20060905213720.A150744004@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE>
	<87r6yns1rl.fsf@cut.bc.hsia.telus.net>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1157728445 26149 80.91.229.2 (8 Sep 2006 15:14:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 15:14:05 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ams@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 08 17:14:04 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GLi3D-0004HG-Im
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 17:13:52 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GLi3C-0004W6-UJ
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 11:13:50 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GLi1I-0008UE-Oj
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 11:11:52 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GLi1I-0008Rp-5e
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 11:11:52 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GLi1H-0008RH-QW
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 11:11:51 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GLi1u-0003My-Au
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 11:12:30 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1GLi1G-0008C9-1d; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 11:11:50 -0400
Original-To: Ryan Yeske <rcyeske@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <87r6yns1rl.fsf@cut.bc.hsia.telus.net> (message from Ryan Yeske
	on Thu, 07 Sep 2006 16:19:42 -0700)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:59564
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/59564>

I think it would be better to change pushnew to expand
into code that does not call any cl functions.  Then programs
that load cl at compile time could use pushnew without problems.

Would someone like to try that?