From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Changing of line format and undo Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 05:52:47 -0400 Message-ID: References: <44987375.2010000@student.lu.se> <449961F6.6020001@student.lu.se> <85mzc6y204.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <44996AE1.7020907@student.lu.se> <858xnqxyg9.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <4499781F.7090802@student.lu.se> <87k66wvx4u.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <44EBD554.6050909@student.lu.se> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1156759055 7931 80.91.229.2 (28 Aug 2006 09:57:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 09:57:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, storm@cua.dk Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 28 11:57:32 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GHdrt-00036I-BW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:57:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GHdrs-0004Br-Vw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 05:57:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GHdnV-0001Si-3b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 05:52:49 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GHdnU-0001SM-Kk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 05:52:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GHdnU-0001SF-FT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 05:52:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GHdwP-0001Hg-Ei for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 06:02:01 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1GHdnT-0005VL-4M; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 05:52:47 -0400 Original-To: Lennart Borgman In-reply-to: <44EBD554.6050909@student.lu.se> (message from Lennart Borgman on Wed, 23 Aug 2006 06:11:00 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:58982 Archived-At: > I am not convinced it is correct to try to make undo cover changes > in how the buffer would be saved. > See it from the users point of view. Is it not desireable then to be able to undo all changes that will be saved to disk? The argument seems powerful, but it would seem to apply just as strongly to set-visited-file-name. Do you think set-visited-file-name should be an undoable buffer change?