From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Out-of-date completions for `read-buffer'
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 11:46:59 -0400
Message-ID: <E1GE6Yl-0008IQ-QH@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <34189.128.165.123.18.1155761732.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov>
	<E1GDjdi-0002n6-4c@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<35245.128.165.123.18.1155844264.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1155916050 19829 80.91.229.2 (18 Aug 2006 15:47:30 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 15:47:30 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 18 17:47:27 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GE6Z7-0000s2-Tp
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 17:47:22 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GE6Z7-0004xf-0h
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 11:47:21 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GE6Yo-0004xQ-Fb
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 11:47:02 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GE6Yn-0004xE-3D
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 11:47:01 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GE6Ym-0004xB-Sr
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 11:47:00 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GE6fW-0006pR-IQ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 11:53:58 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1GE6Yl-0008IQ-QH; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 11:46:59 -0400
Original-To: herring@lanl.gov, eliz@gnu.org
In-reply-to: <35245.128.165.123.18.1155844264.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov>
	(herring@lanl.gov)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:58488
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/58488>

Your patch is clean, but we should call the new function
internal-complete-buffer so that people won't complain that it isn't
documented it in the Lisp Manual.

Would someone (Eli?) please install the patch, with that change?