From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, ken.manheimer@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: two related edebug problems
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 17:50:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1GC1N3-0006tH-Ks@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jwv3bc2x5r7.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan Monnier on Fri, 11 Aug 2006 18:34:29 -0400)
> I found out the cause of the bug. edebug-display calls sit-for to
> pause before displaying eval results, then calls
> edebug-recursive-edit. However, edebug-recursive-edit rebinds
> unread-command-events, causing sit-for interruptions (which are put
> into unread-command-events) to go unnoticed. This creates problems
> when you type in edebug commands in quick succession. I fixed this by
> moving the rebinding of unread-command-events to edebug-display.
This is a workaround rather than a fix. A real fix would be to change
sit-for so it doesn't use unread-command-events but an internal variable
instead with which other code can't mess.
I disagree. unread-command-events is defined to do what it does. If
Lisp code sets it to nil, that gets rid of the pending events. If
Lisp code later sets it back to something non-nil, that restores them.
If the result of doing that isn't what you want, you should not do that.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-12 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-07 18:30 two related edebug problems Ken Manheimer
2006-08-08 18:02 ` Richard Stallman
2006-08-08 19:26 ` Ken Manheimer
2006-08-09 14:42 ` Chong Yidong
2006-08-09 19:42 ` Ken Manheimer
2006-08-10 1:13 ` Richard Stallman
2006-08-10 16:08 ` Chong Yidong
2006-08-11 22:34 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-08-12 0:19 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-08-12 21:50 ` Richard Stallman
2006-08-12 4:02 ` Chong Yidong
2006-08-12 21:50 ` Richard Stallman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1GC1N3-0006tH-Ks@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=cyd@stupidchicken.com \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=ken.manheimer@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.