From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: C-g crash redux Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2006 14:28:52 -0400 Message-ID: References: <877j1qvp4k.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <17617.8764.824445.882539@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <87fygd97j0.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87zmelfihg.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <877j1owmhx.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <874pwsebes.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <17619.50473.875843.483875@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <85r6zvag6y.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1154888955 25763 80.91.229.2 (6 Aug 2006 18:29:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 18:29:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: nickrob@snap.net.nz, romain@orebokech.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, cyd@stupidchicken.com, storm@cua.dk Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 06 20:29:12 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G9nN7-0004Ge-FP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Aug 2006 20:29:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G9nN6-0000FM-Sd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Aug 2006 14:29:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G9nMu-0000F7-95 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Aug 2006 14:28:56 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G9nMs-0000EW-Pq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Aug 2006 14:28:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G9nMs-0000E8-J7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Aug 2006 14:28:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G9nQw-0000nx-N7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Aug 2006 14:33:06 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1G9nMq-0007sR-1K; Sun, 06 Aug 2006 14:28:52 -0400 Original-To: David Kastrup In-reply-to: <85r6zvag6y.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on Sat, 05 Aug 2006 07:45:41 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:58149 Archived-At: Can someone tell me what the issue is, here? >> It looks good to my inexperienced eye, but Emacs seems to go for a long time >> before hitting Fsignal. I wonder if Fsignal resets other things that might not >> add up in the interim period but I don't know what the rules are for placing >> the QUIT macro or whether one could be placed closer to read_char. Why does it matter when, or whether, Emacs would ever call Fsignal?