From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [simon.marshall@misys.com: Font Lock on-the-fly misfontification in C++] Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 16:09:20 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20060723142630.GB1433@muc.de> <20060731220419.GF1271@muc.de> <20060801075924.GA1176@muc.de> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1154463117 12794 80.91.229.2 (1 Aug 2006 20:11:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 20:11:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-pretest-bug-bounces+gebp-emacs-pretest-bug=gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 01 22:11:56 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gebp-emacs-pretest-bug@gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G80ad-0006Hr-ER for gebp-emacs-pretest-bug@gmane.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 22:11:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G80ac-0007Tf-Qp for gebp-emacs-pretest-bug@gmane.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 16:11:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G80YM-0005gY-Ry for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 16:09:23 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G80YL-0005f0-Gc for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 16:09:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G80YL-0005ej-8j; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 16:09:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G80bI-0001LF-NR; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 16:12:24 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1G80YK-0005wW-Fz; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 16:09:20 -0400 Original-To: Alan Mackenzie In-reply-to: <20060801075924.GA1176@muc.de> (message from Alan Mackenzie on Tue, 1 Aug 2006 08:59:25 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for CVS Emacs." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-pretest-bug-bounces+gebp-emacs-pretest-bug=gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-pretest-bug-bounces+gebp-emacs-pretest-bug=gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:13251 gmane.emacs.devel:57964 Archived-At: "Emacs", unqualified, can be ambiguous. It can mean either (i) "an editor of the Emacs persuasion"; or (ii) "the best editor in the world, maintained by the GNU project". In contexts where it is important to emphasise that (ii) is meant, surely "GNU Emacs" is what to write. That is true, but if you want to write "GNU Emacs", then write "GNU XEmacs". Every way of contrasting these two versions of GNU Emacs is partly inaccurate. Using "GNU Emacs" and "XEmacs", the inaccuracy is at the expense of the GNU Project, and I don't want that. So please use a different way, with a different inaccuracy.