From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Canceling dialogues Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 16:09:01 -0400 Message-ID: References: <44CE4007.6020904@student.lu.se> <38295.128.165.123.18.1154374997.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> <851ws1gfr2.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1154462993 12308 80.91.229.2 (1 Aug 2006 20:09:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 20:09:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 01 22:09:51 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G80Yd-0005pj-EA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 22:09:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G80Yc-0005mX-Nw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 16:09:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G80Y4-0005Q3-Bm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 16:09:04 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G80Y3-0005Oy-Kw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 16:09:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G80Y3-0005Oi-1p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 16:09:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G80b0-0001Ia-Cc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 16:12:06 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1G80Y1-0005tI-Ku; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 16:09:01 -0400 Original-To: David Kastrup In-reply-to: <851ws1gfr2.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on Tue, 01 Aug 2006 07:57:21 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:57960 Archived-At: There won't be a "later" until an alternative is selected. It think it would be quite confusing if the menu appeared to do nothing, and then clicking on either "Yes" or "No" would trigger a quit later on. Maybe that means it is a mistake to call y-or-n-p with inhibit-quit set.