From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Copyrights on various (mostly etc/) files.
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 18:16:45 -0400
Message-ID: <E1G7g45-00074I-OQ@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87odvfamf1.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org>
	<E1G7PYg-0000R2-HK@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87bqr6e328.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1154384306 8524 80.91.229.2 (31 Jul 2006 22:18:26 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 22:18:26 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 01 00:18:23 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G7g5b-0006XX-Ig
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 00:18:19 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G7g5a-0008PT-UD
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 18:18:18 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G7g49-0007t3-BO
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 18:16:49 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G7g47-0007rt-Nf
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 18:16:48 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G7g47-0007rl-Gm
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 18:16:47 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G7g6s-0006JQ-AG
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 18:19:38 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1G7g45-00074I-OQ; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 18:16:45 -0400
Original-To: Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org>
In-reply-to: <87bqr6e328.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org> (message from Rob
	Browning on Sun, 30 Jul 2006 22:49:51 -0700)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:57884
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/57884>

    Would it be correct or incorrect to assume that those two files, along
    with INTERVIEW and MOTIVATION, should be considered to be under
    something more like a verbatim only license (like CENSORSHIP and
    WHY-FREE) rather than being freely modifiable?

These files are NOT all the same kind of case.