From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: sit-for
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:29:49 -0400
Message-ID: <E1G7cWT-0005du-EI@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <854px1e8xx.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87d5bppfid.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
	<85wt9wq3u1.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85k65wpzwr.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
	<87vepgii8m.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <m33bci4t50.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1154370638 28393 80.91.229.2 (31 Jul 2006 18:30:38 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 18:30:38 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 31 20:30:37 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G7cWw-000171-CB
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 20:30:18 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G7cWv-0004cf-RC
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:30:17 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G7cWW-0004KA-LF
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:29:52 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G7cWV-0004Ip-Bo
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:29:51 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G7cWV-0004Ii-80
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:29:51 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G7cZD-0004at-Qb
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:32:39 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1G7cWT-0005du-EI; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:29:49 -0400
Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm)
In-reply-to: <m33bci4t50.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> (storm@cua.dk)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:57861
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/57861>

    Since wait_read_process_output now has an end_time rather than a
    duration, it seems possible to make a check on reentry to
    wait_read_process_output whether an "outer" call has an end_time
    BEFORE the end_time of the current call ... and do something sensible,
    e.g.  modify the current end_time to the same as the outer end_time.

This seems like a good idea.