From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Using quail input methods to translate buffer text. Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 10:13:43 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87k66rlqys.fsf@heslin.eclipse.co.uk> <87y7v5fvp2.fsf@dur.ac.uk> <8764i9caau.fsf@heslin.eclipse.co.uk> <87zmfkhqfm.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87u05shq6q.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87ac7hupt2.fsf@heslin.eclipse.co.uk> <87lkqob2fe.fsf@heslin.eclipse.co.uk> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1153836875 3655 80.91.229.2 (25 Jul 2006 14:14:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 14:14:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, pj@heslin.eclipse.co.uk Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 25 16:14:27 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G5Nfu-0004jc-9T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 16:14:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G5Nft-0006xM-Nt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 10:14:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G5NfP-0006iK-D3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 10:13:47 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G5NfN-0006gq-LS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 10:13:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G5NfN-0006gX-Eg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 10:13:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G5Ngh-0001M9-T4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 10:15:07 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1G5NfL-0005WY-Cn; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 10:13:43 -0400 Original-To: Kenichi Handa In-reply-to: (message from Kenichi Handa on Tue, 25 Jul 2006 16:16:44 +0900) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:57611 Archived-At: > It is not out of the question to change the code of quail, or even its > internal structure. Whether it is worth while to do so in this case > depends on details, such as how much benefit users would receive, and > on whether someone is willing to do the work. Aren't we in feature-freeze state now? The proposed one is a new feature. It may be ok to include it if the feature is important enough to break `feature-freeze'. I thought this was for after the release. I don't think we should install this now. So why hesitate to change Quail's structure?