Re: Using quail input methods to translate buffer text.

[Kenichi Handa <handa@m17n.org>]

In article <E1G5546-0002Gq-T5@fencepost.gnu.org>, Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:

>     As Peter wrote, there's no way to make it work 100% with the
>     current implementation of quail.  We have to change internal
>     structure/code of quail somehow.

> It is not out of the question to change the code of quail, or even its
> internal structure.  Whether it is worth while to do so in this case
> depends on details, such as how much benefit users would receive, and
> on whether someone is willing to do the work.

Aren't we in feature-freeze state now?  The proposed one is
a new feature.  It may be ok to include it if the feature is
important enough to break `feature-freeze'.  But I think
that is only when the new feature is just addition and
doesn't require changing of existing code.

Or, are you talking about the work after the release?

---
Kenichi Handa
handa@m17n.org