From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: safe_call1 considered harmful
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:37:04 -0400
Message-ID: <E1G40o4-0007uN-FH@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <uirlrguz3.fsf@gnu.org> <E1G3tGq-0006Z3-00@etlken>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1153510733 26869 80.91.229.2 (21 Jul 2006 19:38:53 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 19:38:53 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 21 21:38:50 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G40pj-0002mV-G7
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 21:38:47 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G40pj-00063L-0A
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:38:47 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G40o6-0005My-K5
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:37:06 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G40o6-0005Md-4p
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:37:06 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G40o5-0005MX-VH
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:37:06 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G40oZ-0005LM-Gy
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:37:35 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1G40o4-0007uN-FH; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:37:04 -0400
Original-To: Kenichi Handa <handa@m17n.org>
In-reply-to: <E1G3tGq-0006Z3-00@etlken> (message from Kenichi Handa on Fri, 21
	Jul 2006 20:34:16 +0900)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:57442
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/57442>

    But, by considering this problem again, I found another
    solution than calling find-operation-coding-system with
    (FILENAME . BUFFER).  That is to provide an extra argument
    BUFFER.

Would you please be more concrete?  Passing an extra argument to a set
of functions is very incompatible.