From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Building Emacs overflowed pure space Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:46:42 -0400 Message-ID: References: <7dbe73ed0607180138x35e9d9bft3e42f20cb369795c@mail.gmail.com> <200607181929.k6IJTZN9028639@jane.dms.auburn.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1153457266 28756 80.91.229.2 (21 Jul 2006 04:47:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 04:47:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mathias.dahl@gmail.com, teirllm@dms.auburn.edu, ralphm@members.fsf.org, mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 21 06:47:44 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G3mvO-0004QM-Q6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 06:47:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G3mvO-0006nE-AK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:47:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G3muU-0006QM-5y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:46:46 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G3muT-0006Pl-BG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:46:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G3muS-0006Ph-Uo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:46:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G3mum-00015M-48; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:47:04 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1G3muQ-0000lL-DW; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:46:42 -0400 Original-To: Stefan Monnier In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Thu, 20 Jul 2006 18:11:41 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:57410 Archived-At: > If the table that arranges for all references to one symbol within > a function to come out as the same symbol is preserved between functions, > that ought to do the job. > However, this might be inconvenient to do. Indeed: it make conflate two different symbols into one No it wouldn't. With my change in the macro, compilation of a single source file, indeed all compilation in a single Emacs session, would use only one symbol for this. The only missing unsolved part of this problem is how to arrange the proper read syntax in the .elc file so that what's one symbol at compile time will read back as one symbol.