From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Building Emacs overflowed pure space Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 11:33:01 -0400 Message-ID: References: <7dbe73ed0607180138x35e9d9bft3e42f20cb369795c@mail.gmail.com> <200607181929.k6IJTZN9028639@jane.dms.auburn.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1153409662 17515 80.91.229.2 (20 Jul 2006 15:34:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 15:34:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mathias.dahl@gmail.com, teirllm@dms.auburn.edu, ralphm@members.fsf.org, mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 20 17:34:19 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G3aX0-0000my-OG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:33:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G3aX0-0002HT-4f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 11:33:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G3aWP-0001n1-Dh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 11:33:05 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G3aWP-0001me-2V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 11:33:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G3aWO-0001mZ-R4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 11:33:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G3aWa-0006FW-9O; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 11:33:16 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1G3aWL-0001HD-G1; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 11:33:01 -0400 Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) In-reply-to: (storm@cua.dk) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:57379 Archived-At: > I see no good reason why each expansion of `dolist' should use a > different symbol. Maybe we can arrange to use one symbol over and > over again. Does this work? Does that really work with nested dolist calls? It ought to; each one will refer to its own binding. It would work with an ordinary interned symbol, too. The only reason to use an uninterned symbol is to avoid interfering with any possible user program.