From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Unicode Lisp reader escapes Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 16:38:01 -0400 Message-ID: References: <17491.34779.959316.484740@parhasard.net> <87odyfnqcj.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <17498.27200.911709.330947@parhasard.net> <877j4z5had.fsf@gmx.de> <87irohfrx1.fsf@gmx.de> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1147725733 23625 80.91.229.2 (15 May 2006 20:42:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 20:42:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: alkibiades@gmx.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 15 22:41:48 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ffjss-0007YS-GE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 May 2006 22:41:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ffjss-0004tm-Ke for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 May 2006 16:41:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FfjpM-0000FD-Ol for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2006 16:38:04 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FfjpM-0000EE-1p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2006 16:38:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FfjpL-0000E5-Ub for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2006 16:38:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Ffjrp-0003DD-GP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2006 16:40:37 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1FfjpJ-0000e6-JE; Mon, 15 May 2006 16:38:01 -0400 Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) In-reply-to: (storm@cua.dk) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:54538 Archived-At: > But, as emacs-mule is not affected by > unify-8859-on-decoding, we don't have to invent it as long > as we suggest people to use emacs-mule in a problematic > case. So why not _always_ use emacs-mule for .elc files (both on write and on load)? .elc files do not undergo decoding. The issue is about compilation and loading of Lisp source files.