From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: C-f in isearch minibuffer
Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 00:52:46 -0400
Message-ID: <E1Fem7S-0002Z2-7v@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <MEEKKIABFKKDFJMPIOEBIEBLDBAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
	<200605030727.k437R2Wx009975@amrm2.ics.uci.edu>
	<m31wvbpl9h.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> <87bqufwbls.fsf@jurta.org>
	<87mzdokank.fsf_-_@jurta.org> <E1FeP3b-0002Mk-Ul@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87psij4hvi.fsf@jurta.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1147496157 16387 80.91.229.2 (13 May 2006 04:55:57 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 04:55:57 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 13 06:55:56 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FemAR-00039h-Dh
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 May 2006 06:55:51 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FemAQ-0002Zv-W9
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 May 2006 00:55:51 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Fem7V-0001Oc-7R
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 May 2006 00:52:49 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Fem7U-0001OB-Ln
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 May 2006 00:52:48 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fem7U-0001O4-Cu
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 May 2006 00:52:48 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Fem9N-0002VB-CI
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 May 2006 00:54:45 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Fem7S-0002Z2-7v; Sat, 13 May 2006 00:52:46 -0400
Original-To: Juri Linkov <juri@jurta.org>
In-reply-to: <87psij4hvi.fsf@jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Fri, 12
	May 2006 14:12:01 +0300)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:54364
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/54364>

Looking at this now, I think that this added meaning of C-f is not as
bad, as a special case, as most of the special search commands,
because it is upward compatible with the usual meaning of C-f.  It is
only special in a case where otherwise it would get an error.

Meanwhile, I have doubts that the M-. proposal is any good.