From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Unicode Lisp reader escapes Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 23:46:04 -0400 Message-ID: References: <17491.34779.959316.484740@parhasard.net> <17495.932.70900.796282@parhasard.net> <17495.57895.90438.848865@parhasard.net> <17498.28361.392872.954484@parhasard.net> <17503.21672.395920.94783@parhasard.net> <17503.29740.778178.932671@parhasard.net> <17504.16146.57393.970540@parhasard.net> <17505.33452.224807.946390@parhasard.net> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1147319431 16399 80.91.229.2 (11 May 2006 03:50:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 03:50:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: kehoea@parhasard.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 11 05:50:28 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fe2C3-00058X-Kp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 05:50:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fe2C3-00050G-7O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 23:50:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fe27q-0000rA-FQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 23:46:06 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fe27p-0000qP-Hy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 23:46:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fe27p-0000qL-60 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 23:46:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Fe29F-0000uL-K6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 23:47:33 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Fe27o-00083z-7E; Wed, 10 May 2006 23:46:04 -0400 Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: (message from Eli Zaretskii on Wed, 10 May 2006 20:49:41 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:54232 Archived-At: > It read ambiguously to me. ``Any Lisp object that you intend to refer to > again'' could be one that you intend to refer to in the bodies of the > functions you call. Can someone in the know (Richard?) state a clear rule? I think the ELisp manual should be unequivocal about the GCPRO issue. I clarified this. Thanks.