From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [drew.adams@oracle.com: RE: Customize doc strings andtagstrings
	do not respect \\<...> and \\[...]]
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 03:12:50 -0500
Message-ID: <E1FOVnO-0002cP-TS@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <DNEMKBNJBGPAOPIJOOICEECKDEAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1143620001 18630 80.91.229.2 (29 Mar 2006 08:13:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 08:13:21 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 29 10:13:19 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FOVni-0006Zv-Od
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 10:13:10 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FOVni-00019n-4S
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 03:13:10 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FOVnT-00017U-1u
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 03:12:55 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FOVnR-00015p-Qi
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 03:12:54 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FOVnR-00015T-LT
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 03:12:53 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FOVpM-0008TZ-1m
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 03:14:52 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1FOVnO-0002cP-TS; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 03:12:51 -0500
Original-To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
In-reply-to: <DNEMKBNJBGPAOPIJOOICEECKDEAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:52182
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/52182>

	It doesn't seem intuitive to me that the value of :tag should be
	considered a documentation string.

Didn't someone define a different keyword which is like :tag
but goes through substitute-command-keys?