From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Re: Emacs current-time-string core dump on 64-bit hosts Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 17:29:24 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87k6arnqsx.fsf@penguin.cs.ucla.edu> <87fyle6luu.fsf@penguin.cs.ucla.edu> <87fyl71sj5.fsf@penguin.cs.ucla.edu> <874q1lu698.fsf@penguin.cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1143507366 21998 80.91.229.2 (28 Mar 2006 00:56:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 00:56:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, eggert@CS.UCLA.EDU Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 28 02:56:03 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FO2Uu-0007Ir-05 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 02:55:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FO2Us-0007K2-Ct for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 19:55:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FO0DG-0004Id-1Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 17:29:26 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FO0DF-0004IA-8r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 17:29:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FO0DF-0004I3-1Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 17:29:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FO0Ep-0002I9-T6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 17:31:03 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1FO0DE-0006yI-9N; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 17:29:24 -0500 Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sun, 26 Mar 2006 22:06:32 +0200) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:15000 Archived-At: The core dumps were not mentioned in the documentation, so I doubt that some code was relying on that. OTOH, it's quite possible that some code _does_ rely on the fact that it never threw an error. To signal an error in a kind of case which formerly could sometimes crash does not seem like a problem to me.