From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Display feature request: gud-overlay-arrow
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:26:16 -0500
Message-ID: <E1FLmUi-0007EF-0n@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <17439.13250.269939.241145@kahikatea.snap.net.nz>
	<m3lkv4k7iq.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1142969196 30367 80.91.229.2 (21 Mar 2006 19:26:36 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 19:26:36 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: nickrob@snap.net.nz, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 21 20:26:35 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FLmUu-00031e-Ut
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 20:26:29 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FLmV3-00070w-S6
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:26:37 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FLmUk-00070T-Rv
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:26:18 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FLmUk-000701-1J
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:26:18 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FLmUj-0006zq-S0
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:26:17 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FLmUm-00027n-WE
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:26:21 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1FLmUi-0007EF-0n; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:26:16 -0500
Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm)
In-reply-to: <m3lkv4k7iq.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> (storm@cua.dk)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:51939
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/51939>

    I guess it would be easier to do if we had a "post-switch-buffer-hook" that
    is called (after post-command-hook) whenever a new buffer is selected
    in the command loop.

I really don't like the idea that Emacs could run hooks when switching
buffers.  It would make things rather uncontrollable.