From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: defvars at compile time Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:32:35 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20403.1141690692@olgas.newt.com> <3861.1142268982@olgas.newt.com> <22907.1142318606@olgas.newt.com> <3669.1142364565@olgas.newt.com> <7035.1142372131@olgas.newt.com> <28215.1142437339@olgas.newt.com> <87zmjqovfj.fsf@olgas.newt.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1142613219 17999 80.91.229.2 (17 Mar 2006 16:33:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 16:33:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: wohler@newt.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 17 17:33:38 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FKHsx-0007F3-HD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 17:33:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FKHsw-0006jl-RV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:33:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FKHsU-0006hm-Dc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:32:38 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FKHsT-0006gU-Cz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:32:37 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FKHsS-0006gB-Uo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:32:37 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FKHxN-0002hc-Ff for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:37:41 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1FKHsR-0000PQ-SE; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:32:35 -0500 Original-To: Miles Bader In-reply-to: (message from Miles Bader on Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:44:49 +0900) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:51768 Archived-At: > Funny name. Seems like value-if-bound would be more accurate. Yeah. Or "bound-value". The name was not chosen carefully because this was not intended as an advertised facility. If we want to make it one, I suggest the name symbol-value-safe. Like car-safe.