From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: feature request: indicator of minibuffer-recursion depth
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 05:32:34 -0500
Message-ID: <E1FJpmU-0001BB-Kq@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <DNEMKBNJBGPAOPIJOOICEELFDDAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
	<85mzfsk7qq.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
	<buoveugjbv1.fsf@dhapc248.dev.necel.com>
	<85slpkf3ek.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1142505190 13860 80.91.229.2 (16 Mar 2006 10:33:10 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 10:33:10 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com, miles@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 16 11:33:05 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FJpmj-0007RL-Lk
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 11:32:50 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FJpmi-0005zp-VX
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 05:32:49 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FJpmX-0005zc-5z
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 05:32:37 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FJpmV-0005zK-U6
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 05:32:36 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FJpmV-0005zF-NY
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 05:32:35 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FJpr8-0004Gs-OC
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 05:37:22 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1FJpmU-0001BB-Kq; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 05:32:34 -0500
Original-To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <85slpkf3ek.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on
	Wed, 15 Mar 2006 10:44:35 +0100)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:51699
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/51699>

    One should probably place an electronic signature into dotemacs files
    and prohibit people from using any code they have not entered all by
    themselves.

    But I guess this scheme would not be compatible with GPL3.

GPLv3 would have nothing to say about the matter as long as users
really can change the code and get rid of the feature.