Re: Clarification on using safe-local-variable-values

[Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>]

    I believe that Richard decided that _every_ variable should be
    considered risky, except when explicitly marked safe.

I decided that every variable should be considered _somewhat_ risky,
if not explicitly marked safe.  This does not _necessarily_ mean
there is no such thing as degrees of risk, so it does not _necessarily_ mean
we should eliminate the concept of marking a variable as risky.

I am not sure that the current way of handling variables marked
risky is really best.  But it might be useful.  So let's leave it
alone, for now.  There is no need to change it.