From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Problem with `while-no-input'
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 12:13:47 -0500
Message-ID: <E1FHOhv-0001XK-LS@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <A47B192B0358794C958615D788BF7FB701A29FD8@mucmail1.sdm.de>
	<m3lkvl2jo4.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1142021501 30567 80.91.229.2 (10 Mar 2006 20:11:41 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 20:11:41 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, klaus.berndl@sdm.de
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 10 21:11:40 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FHnxc-0001v7-8u
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 21:11:40 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FHnxb-0001Io-MN
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 15:11:39 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FHOhz-0004Fm-MS
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 12:13:51 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FHOhy-00049G-EC
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 12:13:50 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FHOhy-000496-6N
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 12:13:50 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FHOl4-0002Lx-Vm
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 12:17:03 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1FHOhv-0001XK-LS; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 12:13:47 -0500
Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm)
In-reply-to: <m3lkvl2jo4.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> (storm@cua.dk)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:51438
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/51438>

    Maybe windoze doesn't have some form of async input processing, so maybe it cannot see if input arrives while it is running lisp code.

If that is so, we should document the deficiency somehow.