From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Display slowness that is painful Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 13:27:23 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87slr5c78p.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <877j8fx43q.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87mzhaqp7p.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1139103547 30721 80.91.229.2 (5 Feb 2006 01:39:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 01:39:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, storm@cua.dk Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 05 02:39:01 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F5YrQ-0002tz-DB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 02:38:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F5Ytu-0008Fg-TL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 20:41:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F5Vof-0004z7-5f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 17:23:37 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F5V7u-0007HF-RI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 16:39:27 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F5UXI-0004nd-Tl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 16:01:37 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F5SDZ-000665-At for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 13:33:05 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1F5S83-00021b-B8; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 13:27:23 -0500 Original-To: Kenichi Handa In-reply-to: (message from Kenichi Handa on Fri, 03 Feb 2006 10:50:24 +0900) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:50014 Archived-At: I think another reason of the slowness is this part (in set_iterator_to_next): ... Because of this, it seems that handle_stop is called for every character after an eight bit character. Isn't it possible to tune it? First of all, why should we recheck faces after display vector? Kim, did your changes address this issue? I am sure there was a good reason to recheck the faces, in general. But there may be specific cases--perhaps this case--where it can be skipped.