From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: command remapping problem
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:11:57 -0500
Message-ID: <E1F44fF-0001g3-3b@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <MEEKKIABFKKDFJMPIOEBCEKECOAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
	<E1F3e2i-0004SC-22@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<m37j8gwleu.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138749388 27639 80.91.229.2 (31 Jan 2006 23:16:28 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 23:16:28 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 01 00:16:27 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F44jX-0002gO-Dx
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 00:16:24 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F44mY-0002NG-JQ
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:19:30 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F44jA-00010g-0H
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:16:00 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F44j9-00010E-EN
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:15:59 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F44j9-000103-BE
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:15:59 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F44hh-0006RR-Uc
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:14:30 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1F44fF-0001g3-3b; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:11:57 -0500
Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm)
In-reply-to: <m37j8gwleu.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> (storm@cua.dk)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:49849
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/49849>

    > and it seems to be true that this kind of remap only applies
    > to bindings in the same keymap that contains the remap.
    > In that example, the remapping did not apply to C-v OR to <next>.

    Are you sure you are in a buffer which uses lisp-mode-map ?

You're right, I wasn't.

Checking more carefully now, I don't see any bug.