From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Inconsistency in whole buffer buttons.
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 18:08:16 -0500
Message-ID: <E1EyGyu-0005g9-0U@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <200601130314.k0D3ECv16479@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
	<E1ExeHR-0001xa-MK@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<200601150317.k0F3HO924601@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1137366857 4378 80.91.229.2 (15 Jan 2006 23:14:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 23:14:17 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 16 00:14:16 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EyH4S-0004ry-BG
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 00:14:01 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EyH6i-0002Pt-6u
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 18:16:20 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EyH3o-0000FA-T3
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 18:13:21 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EyH3n-0000E2-At
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 18:13:19 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EyH3n-0000Dm-0Q
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 18:13:19 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EyH7C-0007XI-EC
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 18:16:50 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1EyGyu-0005g9-0U; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 18:08:16 -0500
Original-To: Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>
In-reply-to: <200601150317.k0F3HO924601@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (message from
	Luc Teirlinck on Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:17:24 -0600 (CST))
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:49147
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/49147>

       I think it is best if none of the buffer buttons
       asks for confirmation in a single-option buffer.

    I have implemented this and installed it in CVS.

Thanks.