From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Inconsistency in whole buffer buttons.
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:14:43 -0500
Message-ID: <E1Exo39-0007xg-Ga@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <DNEMKBNJBGPAOPIJOOICAEGFDBAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
	<200601132217.k0DMHgm05718@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
	<m3mzhz4s5c.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1137262056 6298 80.91.229.2 (14 Jan 2006 18:07:36 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:07:36 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: teirllm@dms.auburn.edu, drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 14 19:07:34 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ExpoE-0005kX-Pc
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:07:27 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Expmh-0002sS-Uw
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:05:52 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ExoCB-0000Aw-D1
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:24:03 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ExoC8-000099-2V
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:24:00 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Exo7q-000761-6g
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:19:34 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ExoB1-0005Br-HF
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:22:51 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Exo39-0007xg-Ga; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:14:43 -0500
Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm)
In-reply-to: <m3mzhz4s5c.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> (storm@cua.dk)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:49088
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/49088>

    It is superfluous to ask for confirmation in single option buffers, so we
    shouldn't do that.

That's what I've decided.