From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Visual cleanup for customize buffers
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:49:23 -0500
Message-ID: <E1ExeHz-00023D-Fv@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <m3r77dm7lq.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
	<200601122345.k0CNjx114407@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1137218035 15554 80.91.229.2 (14 Jan 2006 05:53:55 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 05:53:55 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, storm@cua.dk
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 14 06:53:53 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ExeMK-0008UO-W2
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:53:53 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ExeOV-0005GY-D0
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:56:07 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ExeMe-0004XL-6j
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:54:12 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ExeMc-0004UM-KE
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:54:11 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ExeMc-0004U0-1Y
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:54:10 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ExePi-0008BF-Mj
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:57:22 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1ExeHz-00023D-Fv; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:49:23 -0500
Original-To: Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>
In-reply-to: <200601122345.k0CNjx114407@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (message from
	Luc Teirlinck on Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:45:59 -0600 (CST))
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:49064
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/49064>

    To hide them from the whole buffer buttons, from key bindings that
    operate on the whole buffer and from menu bar items that operate on
    the whole buffer.  (These operations ignore hidden options and faces.)

Do they ignore options and faces whose _values_ are hidden?
That is not the same thing as for the option itself to be hidden.