From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: coding tags and utf-16 Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 15:05:59 +0900 Message-ID: References: <20051221.090033.182620434.wl@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1136614006 5293 80.91.229.2 (7 Jan 2006 06:06:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 06:06:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 07 07:06:42 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ev7Dt-0003cA-1c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2006 07:06:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ev7Fh-0005xD-6I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2006 01:08:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ev7FP-0005wg-Fr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2006 01:08:15 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ev7FN-0005wS-0b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2006 01:08:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ev7FM-0005wP-Ui for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2006 01:08:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.47.44.130] (helo=tsukuba.m17n.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1Ev7H0-0003nI-FH; Sat, 07 Jan 2006 01:09:55 -0500 Original-Received: from nfs.m17n.org (nfs.m17n.org [192.47.44.7]) by tsukuba.m17n.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k07661XE001598; Sat, 7 Jan 2006 15:06:01 +0900 Original-Received: from etlken (etlken.m17n.org [192.47.44.125]) by nfs.m17n.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k07661nZ025481; Sat, 7 Jan 2006 15:06:01 +0900 Original-Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Ev7DD-0002JA-00; Sat, 07 Jan 2006 15:05:59 +0900 Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-reply-to: (rms@gnu.org) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:48811 Archived-At: In article , "Richard M. Stallman" writes: > As Werner wrote, his method is still in progress. And, it > seems that "emitting warning" is an important point in his > method. But I think it's not a trivial change to enable > Emacs to emit warning while (or after) detecting a code. > Why is that hard? I didn't say it's hard. I don't know how hard it is at the moment. But, my gut feeling is that the required change is not simple and not suitable for the Emacs of the current stage. First of all, we must start from deciding a precise recipe of how and when to emit what kind of warning in which case. --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org