From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: coding tags and utf-16
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 23:23:35 -0500
Message-ID: <E1Ev5c7-0002nt-MJ@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <20051221.090033.182620434.wl@gnu.org> <E1Eu2Ln-00032e-00@etlken>
	<E1EuM4r-00051L-Sf@fencepost.gnu.org> <E1EuMop-0006QZ-00@etlken>
	<E1EueGK-000837-ED@fencepost.gnu.org> <E1Eupk5-0000Ux-00@etlken>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1136608017 22064 80.91.229.2 (7 Jan 2006 04:26:57 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 04:26:57 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 07 05:26:56 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ev5fF-0006DV-QE
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2006 05:26:50 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ev5h3-00004u-Uf
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2006 23:28:41 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ev5ff-0007nW-Eu
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2006 23:27:15 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ev5fe-0007lv-Ax
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2006 23:27:14 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ev5fd-0007ll-UK
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2006 23:27:14 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Ev5hV-0005ef-JU
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2006 23:29:09 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Ev5c7-0002nt-MJ; Fri, 06 Jan 2006 23:23:35 -0500
Original-To: Kenichi Handa <handa@m17n.org>
In-reply-to: <E1Eupk5-0000Ux-00@etlken> (message from Kenichi Handa on Fri, 06
	Jan 2006 20:26:45 +0900)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:48810
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/48810>

    As Werner wrote, his method is still in progress.  And, it
    seems that "emitting warning" is an important point in his
    method.  But I think it's not a trivial change to enable
    Emacs to emit warning while (or after) detecting a code.

Why is that hard?