From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: confusing info in C-u C-x =
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 16:15:11 -0500
Message-ID: <E1EkpaB-0005kF-W2@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <20051120.105550.163003414.wl@gnu.org>
	<je1x1b4aex.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <E1EkAu8-0004QI-00@etlken>
	<87u0divrk2.fsf@jurta.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1134163085 9561 80.91.229.2 (9 Dec 2005 21:18:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 21:18:05 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: schwab@suse.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 09 22:18:03 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EkpcZ-00088a-Iq
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 22:17:39 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ekpcv-0005bG-DM
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 16:18:01 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EkpbL-0004sE-JJ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 16:16:23 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EkpbK-0004ro-Qt
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 16:16:23 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EkpbK-0004rh-Le
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 16:16:22 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Ekpca-0001Vo-KI
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 16:17:40 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1EkpaB-0005kF-W2; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 16:15:12 -0500
Original-To: Juri Linkov <juri@jurta.org>
In-reply-to: <87u0divrk2.fsf@jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Fri, 09
	Dec 2005 11:57:38 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:47345
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/47345>

    I propose using (generate-new-buffer-name "*Help*") in both functions
    to generate the standard unique names like *Help*<2>.

That would result in always creating a new buffer for this command.
That is not desirable at all.  Thanks, but we won't make this change.