From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: log-view documentation Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 10:49:02 -0500 Message-ID: References: <17284.9087.508309.641956@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17285.22648.602817.559583@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1132939225 2954 80.91.229.2 (25 Nov 2005 17:20:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 17:20:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 25 18:20:23 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EfhDk-0004Hj-54 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 18:18:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EfhDj-0003PF-HP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:18:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Effow-0003xW-Ut for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 10:49:07 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Effov-0003wX-Hr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 10:49:05 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Effou-0003wF-38 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 10:49:04 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Effot-0002yt-WF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 10:49:04 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Effos-0003kL-DF; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 10:49:02 -0500 Original-To: Nick Roberts In-reply-to: <17285.22648.602817.559583@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> (message from Nick Roberts on Thu, 24 Nov 2005 19:06:48 +1300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:46570 Archived-At: I think you might look at the revision indicated by the current line before the previous one (which can currently be done with `J' then `P'. I don't understand the suggestion. Could you possibly give me a patch to my text which would show your suggestion? How about using A for annotating the revision indicated by the current line (its more mnemonic) and C-u A for the revision before the one indicated by the current line? Since J annotates the revision indicated by the current line, wouldn't it be redundant for A to do that too? And wouldn't C-u A be less convenient than A? But since I don't use this feature, I don't have a strong opinion.