From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 00:43:19 -0500
Message-ID: <E1EbtbD-0004Cb-8y@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <DNEMKBNJBGPAOPIJOOICCEMDCOAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
	<09522B32-62F6-4FBF-AD42-59B8E58E6E07@gmail.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1132033719 11568 80.91.229.2 (15 Nov 2005 05:48:39 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 05:48:39 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 15 06:48:18 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ebtc0-0007Pm-7J
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 06:44:08 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ebtbz-0006l4-KU
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 00:44:07 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EbtbF-0006WJ-K1
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 00:43:21 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EbtbE-0006Vs-Az
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 00:43:20 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EbtbD-0006Vi-R0
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 00:43:20 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EbtbE-0005rz-9F
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 00:43:20 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1EbtbD-0004Cb-8y; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 00:43:19 -0500
Original-To: David Reitter <david.reitter@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <09522B32-62F6-4FBF-AD42-59B8E58E6E07@gmail.com> (message from
	David Reitter on Sun, 13 Nov 2005 23:06:20 +0000)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:46004
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/46004>

Normally we don't get a lot of boring entries for self-insert-command
because consecutive characters are grouped into one line.  Why doesn't
that work for encoded-kbd-self-insert-ccl as well?

Any sort of reordering or abbreviation of boring entries
in describe-bindings would be fine.  For instance,
I was just thinking of putting all function keys (symbols)
after all characters (numbers).