From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ping2: Re: is undefined Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 20:29:00 +0900 Message-ID: References: <20051001193132.GE25392@radix50.net> <20051021180026.GA19632@radix50.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1130158317 7195 80.91.229.2 (24 Oct 2005 12:51:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 12:51:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ibr@radix50.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 24 14:51:46 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EU1n9-0003kJ-Al for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 14:51:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EU1n8-0008Il-Qm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 08:51:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EU0Vp-0007eV-S6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 07:29:10 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EU0Vn-0007dy-Oi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 07:29:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EU0Vn-0007dt-BN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 07:29:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.47.44.130] (helo=tsukuba.m17n.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1EU0Vn-0004c7-2E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 07:29:07 -0400 Original-Received: from nfs.m17n.org (nfs.m17n.org [192.47.44.7]) by tsukuba.m17n.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j9OBT3bB001199; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 20:29:03 +0900 Original-Received: from etlken (etlken.m17n.org [192.47.44.125]) by nfs.m17n.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j9OBT2BH000597; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 20:29:02 +0900 Original-Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1EU0Vg-0004aM-00; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 20:29:00 +0900 Original-To: Kenichi Handa In-reply-to: (message from Kenichi Handa on Sat, 22 Oct 2005 10:45:26 +0900) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:44702 Archived-At: In article , Kenichi Handa writes: > In article <20051021180026.GA19632@radix50.net>, Baurzhan Ismagulov writes: >> Hello Handa, >> On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 09:53:48PM +0900, Kenichi Handa wrote: >>> But, for instance, for XK_Cyrillic_GHE_bar, I don't know the >>> corresponding Unicode character code. If you give me a list >>> of keysym_codes and the corresponding Unicode character >>> code, I'll add it in x-win.el. >> could you please share your plans regarding this issue? The list of the >> characters and a patch are at >> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2005-10/msg00176.html . >> The patch may be encoded wrongly. > I'm very sorry for not responding on this matter. I'm now > working on it. Please wait for a while. I've just installed a fix. Actually, I registered more Cyrillic characters in x-keysym-table than what you listed (e.g. 0x681 for XK_Cyrillic_ZHE_descender) because... James Cloos writes: [...] > The diff between revisions 1.2 and 1.3 of that file as seen at: > http://cvs.freedesktop.org/xorg/xc/include/keysymdef.h?r1=1.2&r2=1.3 > shows several changes from old-style keysyms to unicode keysyms. the above page indicates that some version of X contains them too, and I confirmed that some distribution surely has them. In addition, > That checkin replaced all uppercase hex constants with lowercase, > added unicode codepoint comments (from UnicodeData.txt), and > switched several blocks to the unicode block (0x1000000 to 0x1FFFFFF). I installed changes to handle them in xterm.c without calling Lisp but by directly using MAKE_CHAR macro. But, I can't test them becasue my X server doesn't have those keysyms. If yours does, please test it. --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org