From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Misleading error messages from bytecomp.el
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 00:42:21 -0400
Message-ID: <E1ETXgb-0003MZ-5b@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <4352711E.6020307@soem.dk> <435A06FF.2040202@soem.dk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1130042612 19709 80.91.229.2 (23 Oct 2005 04:43:32 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 04:43:32 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 23 06:43:30 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ETXhH-0002gX-Di
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 06:43:04 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ETXhG-0005Z8-UA
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 00:43:02 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ETXgc-0005M9-G2
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 00:42:22 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ETXgb-0005Lm-R9
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 00:42:22 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ETXgb-0005LW-HL
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 00:42:21 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ETXgc-0003Nf-0F
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 00:42:22 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1ETXgb-0003MZ-5b; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 00:42:21 -0400
Original-To: Lars Hansen <larsh@soem.dk>
In-reply-to: <435A06FF.2040202@soem.dk> (message from Lars Hansen on Sat, 22
	Oct 2005 11:31:43 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:44595
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/44595>

The patch is clever.  Please install it, but also please document the
meaning of the new ADD-LAMBDA argument of byte-compile-lambda, and
explain the reason why it is used.