From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Screen real estate utiliziation
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 14:13:35 -0400
Message-ID: <E1EIs3D-0004jE-BW@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87zmqdnfl5.fsf@wigwam.deepwood.net>
	<E1EGy3o-0003Nb-NR@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87wtl81g4a.fsf@wigwam.deepwood.net>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1127499557 13337 80.91.229.2 (23 Sep 2005 18:19:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 18:19:17 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 23 20:19:07 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EIs6s-0003di-6q
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 20:17:22 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EIs6r-0005M9-GQ
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 14:17:21 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EIs6O-0005CD-UC
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 14:16:53 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EIs6K-0005A5-T8
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 14:16:49 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EIs6K-00059Y-MN
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 14:16:48 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EIs4O-0001EW-QU
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 14:14:48 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1EIs3D-0004jE-BW; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 14:13:49 -0400
Original-To: Daniel Brockman <daniel@brockman.se>
In-reply-to: <87wtl81g4a.fsf@wigwam.deepwood.net> (message from Daniel
	Brockman on Fri, 23 Sep 2005 07:56:53 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:43184
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/43184>

    So do we add `window-pixel-height' and `window-pixel-width'
    functions,

I think that is best, since it would not break things.