From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: defvars at compile time
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 00:57:28 -0400
Message-ID: <E1EGUlU-00030m-KW@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <f7ccd24b0509160348557cda72@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1126933414 31945 80.91.229.2 (17 Sep 2005 05:03:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 05:03:34 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: dominik@science.uva.nl, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 17 07:03:33 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EGUq8-0002bG-3m
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 07:02:16 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EGUq7-000191-FK
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 01:02:15 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EGUoW-0000bC-S5
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 01:00:38 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EGUoP-0000Y0-VO
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 01:00:32 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EGUoP-0000V6-4B
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 01:00:29 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EGUlY-0008Nu-PK
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 00:57:32 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1EGUlU-00030m-KW; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 00:57:28 -0400
Original-To: lekktu@gmail.com
In-reply-to: <f7ccd24b0509160348557cda72@mail.gmail.com> (message from Juanma
	Barranquero on Fri, 16 Sep 2005 12:48:35 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:43027
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/43027>

The only effect of a defvar with no initial value
is to silence the compiler.  So it is superfluous
to put it inside eval-when-compile.