international/swedish.el

international/swedish.el

[Richard M. Stallman]

Is that file still useful?  Should we move it to obsolete?

Re: international/swedish.el

[jhd]

> Is that file still useful?  Should we move it to obsolete?

I think it is ok to move to obsolete.  I haven't seen anyone using  
the swedish version of ISO-646 in many years.

     Jan D.

Re: international/swedish.el

[Henrik Enberg]

jhd <jan.h.d@swipnet.se> writes:

>> Is that file still useful?  Should we move it to obsolete?
>
> I think it is ok to move to obsolete.  I haven't seen anyone using  the
> swedish version of ISO-646 in many years.

I believe it's even considered harmful in both the swenet. and
se. hierarchies.

Re: international/swedish.el

[Juanma Barranquero]

> >> Is that file still useful?  Should we move it to obsolete?

> > I think it is ok to move to obsolete.  I haven't seen anyone using  the
> > swedish version of ISO-646 in many years.

> I believe it's even considered harmful in both the swenet. and
> se. hierarchies.

So, do we move it to obsolete?

-- 
                    /L/e/k/t/u

Re: international/swedish.el

[Jan D.]

>>>> Is that file still useful?  Should we move it to obsolete?
>>>>
>
>
>>> I think it is ok to move to obsolete.  I haven't seen anyone  
>>> using  the
>>> swedish version of ISO-646 in many years.
>>>
>
>
>> I believe it's even considered harmful in both the swenet. and
>> se. hierarchies.
>>
>
> So, do we move it to obsolete?

I thought I did that, but I see that I moved iso-swed.el to  
obsolete.  Should it remain there or shall we take it back?  I'll  
move the correct file now :-)

     Jan D.

Re: international/swedish.el

[Juanma Barranquero]

On 8/23/05, Jan D. <jan.h.d@swipnet.se> wrote:

> Should it remain there or shall we take it back?

No idea, but the file is from 1993 and with no much change since then.
I'll suggest leaving it in obsolete/ until someone complains ;-)

-- 
                    /L/e/k/t/u

Re: international/swedish.el

[Jason Rumney]

Jan D. wrote:

> I thought I did that, but I see that I moved iso-swed.el to  
> obsolete.  Should it remain there or shall we take it back?  I'll  
> move the correct file now :-)
>
Both files appear to deal with ISO-646, so they both probably belong in 
obsolete.

Re: international/swedish.el

[Richard M. Stallman]

    I thought I did that, but I see that I moved iso-swed.el to  
    obsolete.

If the Swedish version of ISO 646 is obsolete, then iso-swed.el
must be obsolete too.  So please leave iso-swed.el in obsolete
and move swedish.el there too.

Re: international/swedish.el

[Juanma Barranquero]

Speaking of obsolete, I'd bet term/bg-mouse.el is not the newest and
shiniest of Emacs packages, as it tries to use a `mouse-map' var that
was deleted fourteen years and nine days ago, on August, 15, 1991...
:)

-- 
                    /L/e/k/t/u

Re: international/swedish.el

[Richard M. Stallman]

    Speaking of obsolete, I'd bet term/bg-mouse.el is not the newest and
    shiniest of Emacs packages, as it tries to use a `mouse-map' var that
    was deleted fourteen years and nine days ago, on August, 15, 1991...
    :)

I guess nobody has tried running Emacs on a BitGraph terminal since
then.  Perhaps none of them exist.  Would you like to move that file
to obsolete?

Re: international/swedish.el

[Juanma Barranquero]

On 8/25/05, Richard M. Stallman <rms@gnu.org> wrote:

> Would you like to move that file to obsolete?

I'll do.

                    /L/e/k/t/u