From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [EPeterson@mcdonaldbradley.com: Kill ring leak in winemacs macros] Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 02:24:40 -0400 Message-ID: References: <34161.128.165.123.83.1123097221.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> <42F1208D.1070307@student.lu.se> <34340.128.165.123.83.1123102769.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> <40280.128.165.123.83.1124204823.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> <43020FDF.6060007@gnu.org> <430211FD.5000507@gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1124260991 26084 80.91.229.2 (17 Aug 2005 06:43:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 06:43:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ihs_4664@yahoo.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, jasonr@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 17 08:43:01 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E5HdZ-0002qi-VZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 08:42:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E5Hh1-0005zy-L2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 02:46:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E5HYh-0004XD-2T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 02:37:55 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E5HYf-0004Vw-Al for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 02:37:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E5HYd-0004Ff-JS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 02:37:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1E5HeP-0000aa-At for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 02:43:49 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1E5HLs-0003ut-Pl; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 02:24:41 -0400 Original-To: Jason Rumney In-reply-to: <430211FD.5000507@gnu.org> (message from Jason Rumney on Tue, 16 Aug 2005 17:19:09 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:42169 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:42169 > I'm not convinced this change is a good one. What if your macro > involves a call-process call to an external program that interacts > with Emacs via the keyboard? clipboard, of course, not keyboard. That must be very rare--are there any programs that could be invoked this way that would use the clipboard? Normally such programs would communicate thru files.